Abstract Background The optimal preventive strategy for contrast induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization remains uncertain. Objective We conducted Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different preventive strategies for CIAKI in these cohorts. Methods Forty-nine randomized controlled trials were extracted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL data bases (inception-1st December 2017). We calculated median of the odds ratio(OR) with the corresponding 95% credible interval (CrI). The ranking probability of each treatment was based on SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking curve). Results In NMA of 28,063 patients [normal saline (NS: 9716 patients), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3: 4484 patients), statin (2542 patients), N-acetylcysteine (NAC: 3006 patients), NAC + NaHCO3 (774 patients), NS + NAC (3807 patients), NS + NaHCO3 (135 patients) and placebo (3599 patients)], statins reduced the relative risk of CIAKI compared with NS (OR: 0.50; 95% CrI, 0.25–0.99), and placebo (OR: 0.44; 95% CrI, 0.24–0.83). Subgroup analyses showed that in patients receiving low osmolar contrast, statins reduced the relative risk of CIAKI by 58% versus NS, and 51% versus placebo. There were no significant differences across all the treatments in terms of risk of hemodialysis or all-cause mortality. Statins had the highest probability for reducing the risk of CIAKI (SUCRA, 0.86), risk of hemodialysis (SUCRA, 0.88) and all-cause mortality (SUCRA, 0.81). Conclusion Statins were the superior preventive strategy for reducing the risk of CIAKI compared with NS alone and placebo. Read the complete article on Science Direct